Skip to content
← Theoretical 1

Q20 - Flycatcher Song Dialects and Species Discrimination

Theoretical 1 Real exam question - full text reproduced under IBO's CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license

The pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) and collared flycatcher (F. albicollis) are two closely related and morphologically very similar bird species.

Their cross-species hybrids are completely sterile.

Their geographical distributions partially overlap (Figure 1A).

A recent study recorded songs of 168 male flycatchers of both species from different geographic locations. Various acoustic parameters of individual songs were measured, and differences between songs were visualized using principal component analysis (PCA) (Figure 1B). PCA integrates different parameters of the song and transforms them into principal components (PC), which allows for the reduction of multidimensional data to a few dimensions (two in this case, PC1 and PC2). Similar songs will have similar values for a given principal component.

The recorded songs were also played to F. hypoleuca nestlings and the nestlings’ begging calls in response to the songs were counted (Figures 2 and 3).

In this study, the rate at which nestlings responded to the played male songs from their population did not correlate with how similar the played songs were to the songs of their social fathers. Social fathers are the males whose calls nestlings hear most often.

Figure 1. Panel A shows a map of Europe with the range of F. hypoleuca (yellow), F. albicollis (blue), and their overlap zone (green). Colored dots mark F. hypoleuca populations used in the study. Panel B shows a PCA plot with PC1 and PC2 axes. Individual songs are plotted as dots, with F. hypoleuca songs (various colors by population) enclosed in a yellow 95% ellipse and F. albicollis songs (blue dots) in a blue ellipse. The two species form distinct clusters in PCA space, and within F. hypoleuca, songs from the same population cluster together. Figure 1. A: Geographic distribution of F. hypoleuca (yellow) and F. albicollis (blue), with overlap (green). Colored dots show F. hypoleuca populations used in the study. B: PCA of individual songs. Each dot represents one individual’s song. Yellow and blue ellipses enclose 95% of the data points for each species.

Figure 2. Boxplots showing the number of begging calls (N, mean within clutch) by F. hypoleuca nestlings in response to recorded songs of F. hypoleuca (yellow) or F. albicollis (blue) males. Left panel (Allopatry, 6 populations, 347 clutches) shows a significant difference (P < 0.001) with more begging calls for conspecific songs. Right panel (Sympatry, 1 population, 37 clutches) shows no significant difference (P = 0.136). Figure 2. Begging calls (N) by F. hypoleuca nestlings. Left: Allopatry (6 populations, 347 clutches). Right: Sympatry (1 population, 37 clutches). Yellow = F. hypoleuca songs, Blue = F. albicollis songs.

Figure 3. Boxplots showing the number of begging calls (N, mean within clutch) by F. hypoleuca nestlings in response to three categories of F. hypoleuca songs. LS (local-similar, grey): songs similar to the local population. LD (local-dissimilar, black): songs dissimilar to the local population. CS (collared-similar, blue): songs similar to F. albicollis. LS vs LD shows a significant difference (P = 0.035). LD vs CS shows no significant difference (P = 0.999). Figure 3. Begging calls (N) by F. hypoleuca nestlings in response to: LS = songs similar to local population (grey), LD = songs dissimilar to local population (black), CS = songs similar to F. albicollis (blue).

Q20.1. These results support the existence of local song dialects in F. hypoleuca.
Q20.2. These results support the idea that song differences between F. hypoleuca and F. albicollis evolved primarily as an adaptation to avoid cross-species hybridization.
Q20.3. This study provides evidence that F. hypoleuca nestlings learn their songs from their social fathers.
Q20.4. It might be expected that genome-average genetic differences between F. hypoleuca populations will increase over time.

Question reproduced from IBO 2023, Theoretical Paper 1, licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 - attributed to the International Biology Olympiad. Open the full exam PDF